Chinese security cameras: who owns them, where the video goes

Parenting forums are full of warnings that a cheap camera sends your nursery to China. Some of it is documented, much of it is not, and the country on the box tells you less than you'd think. What matters is where the video goes, and whether the camera works without its maker's cloud.

Updated
In short
  • A Chinese-made camera is not automatically unsafe: what matters is whether video goes through the maker's cloud and whether it works without it.
  • TP-Link, the maker of Tapo, is now a US company based in California. Five US states sued it in 2026 over its China ties; it denies the claims and no court has ruled.
  • Leaks hit US brands too: Ring (FTC order, 2023) and Wyze (strangers' thumbnails, 2024), as well as eufy (2022) and Xiaomi (2020). Each said what it fixed.
  • Hikvision and Dahua are the camera makers under a US ban: since 2022 the FCC approves no new equipment from them.
  • The local route: a camera with RTSP, its internet blocked on the router, and an app that reads it over your Wi-Fi.

Do Chinese security cameras send data to China?

Mostly not in the way people fear. The big brands store data for Western customers outside China. Xiaomi's privacy policy names hosting in India, the Netherlands, Russia and Singapore. It also says data "may also be remotely accessed from the Chinese Mainland" for troubleshooting and after-sales service. EZVIZ, Hikvision's consumer brand, lists data centers in the US, Singapore, Brazil, Ireland and Frankfurt.

China does appear in some policies, and they say so plainly. EZVIZ's customer-service notice stores support data on servers "located in China, Ireland and other jurisdictions". Tuya, the platform behind many Smart Life cameras, runs seven data centers, one of them in Shanghai, and stores data in the one the customer chooses. In 2021 Tuya told US senators it isolates each region's data and has never been asked to hand another country's data to a government. No outside audit backs that yet.

The worry is less about a server's address than about company law. When five US states sued TP-Link in 2026, they argued its apps' data could be exposed under a 2017 Chinese intelligence law. CE Pro notes the suits do not allege that the Chinese government actually obtained customer data; they describe a risk. TP-Link says it does not and will not share customer network data with foreign governments.

So ask three things: who owns the company, where its servers are, and what your camera sends. The table answers the first two, with the dated record.

BrandOwner and baseWhere cloud data goes (its own policy)Documented incidents and actionsWorks without the cloud?
TP-Link / TapoTP-Link Systems Inc., Irvine, California, since October 2024; says it split from China's TP-LINK TechnologiesUS users served by TP-Link Systems, others by a Singapore company; Tapo Care clips on AWSDec 2024: US probes reported. Oct 2025: a Commerce ban reported proposed, then shelved in Feb 2026. Texas sued in Feb 2026; Florida, Iowa, Montana and Nebraska in Oct 2026. TP-Link denies; no ruling. Dec 2025 and Aug 2026: TP-Link fixed flaws that let someone on the home network take over a Tapo C200, C100, C425 or C520WS without a passwordyes: RTSP and ONVIF with a Camera Account; setup needs the internet once
XiaomiXiaomi, ChinaIndia, the Netherlands (EU users), Russia, Singapore; remote access from mainland China for supportJan 2020: a Nest Hub showed stills from strangers' Xiaomi cameras. Google cut the link; Xiaomi blamed a cache update and fixed itno on most models: no official RTSP
eufyAnker Innovations, ChinaVideo stored on the device; thumbnails briefly on AWSMay 2021: a server upgrade showed users random feeds. Nov 2022: thumbnails uploaded, web streams unencrypted. Feb 2023: Anker admitted it and encrypted the streams. Jan 2025: New York settled with its US sellers for $450,000; a live stream had been open to anyone with its linkpartly: local storage, but viewing needs the eufy app and login
WyzeWyze Labs, Kirkland, WashingtonWyze's cloud for alerts, thumbnails and remote viewDec 2019: a database with data on 2.4 million users left open. Mar 2022: three camera flaws published, v1 never fixed. Feb 2024: 13,000 users got strangers' thumbnails; new verification layer addedlimited: microSD; RTSP only on a beta for some models
RingAmazon, USARing's cloud; end-to-end encryption optional since 2021May 2023 FTC order, $5.8 million: an employee viewed customers' videos; about 55,000 accounts taken over; no two-factor login until 2019. Refunds to 117,044 customers in April 2024no
Google NestGoogle, USAStored with your Google account (Nest Aware)Jan 2019: strangers spoke through cameras via reused passwords; Google said Nest was not breached and made login codes mandatory in 2020. Feb 2026: the FBI recovered video from a disconnected camera with no subscription, from "residual data" on Google's serversno
NanitNanit, New YorkStream pushed through Nanit's servers; video kept only with a paid planJune 2024: parents heard a voice-like sound. Two outside firms found no breach; Nanit traced it to an echo-cancellation bug and fixed it in firmwareno
OwletOwlet, Lehi, UtahOwlet's servers, via the base station or cameraOct 2016: the sock's base station ran an open Wi-Fi network anyone nearby could join. May 2024: the Owlet Cam could be taken over from the home network through its Kalay software; patched. Its July 2026 policy allows training AI on user datano
ImouDahua's consumer brand since 2018, run by Hangzhou Huacheng (China); Dahua announced selling its stake in 2025Data centers in the US, Germany and SingaporeDahua: on the FCC Covered List since 2021; no new FCC approvals since Nov 2022yes: RTSP and ONVIF
Hikvision / EZVIZHikvision, Hangzhou; largest shareholder state-owned CETC. EZVIZ listed separately in 2022EZVIZ: US, Singapore, Brazil, Ireland, Frankfurt; support data in China and IrelandOct 2019: US Entity List. 2021: FCC Covered List. Nov 2022: no new FCC approvalsyes: RTSP and ONVIF with the device password
ReolinkReolink Innovation Ltd. (its policy gives no country)Reolink Cloud on AWSnone found by usyes: works without the internet; RTSP on most models
LorexLorex; owned by Dahua until 2022, then sold to Taiwan's Skywatchnot checked by usSept 2025 Nebraska, Feb 2026 Texas, June 2026 Missouri sue, alleging hidden ties to Dahua. Lorex asked the Nebraska court to dismiss the suit on jurisdiction grounds; no ruling on the claimsnot checked
Meari (CloudEdge app; sold under many brand names)Hangzhou Meari Technology, ChinaImages were on Alibaba serversMay 2026: a researcher reached about 1.1 million cameras with one key from the app. Meari closed the main hole and paid a bountyno

Checked October 28, 2026, from each company's own policy, regulators and the reporting in the sources. A lawsuit is an allegation until a court rules.

Headquarters, servers, and what actually leaves your home

Even a camera you only watch locally keeps calling home. A Tapo C200 owner on TP-Link's forum logged lookups for tplinknbu.com about every six seconds. He blocked them with Pi-hole and kept using the camera in Home Assistant.

Who runs the cloud of a no-name camera?

Often not the brand on the box. Cheap cameras and many baby monitors are built on a handful of shared platforms: one company writes the app and runs the servers, and dozens of brands put their logo on it. A flaw in the platform hits every brand at once. The app you were told to install gives the platform away.

PlatformSpot it byWhat was foundFixed?
Mearithe CloudEdge app; Arenti, ieGeek, Boifun, AnranMay 2026: about 1.1 million monitors and cameras in 118 countries; alert images on servers without a password, one key shared by allfirmware 3.0.0 and later; the shared keys stay in older devices
HiChipthe CamHi app; Accfly, Elite Security, Genbolt, ieGeek, SV3C and about 40 moreJune 2020, Which?: over 100,000 UK cameras could be watched and spoken through, even after a password changeHiChip sent new firmware for testing
Gwelltimesthe Yoosee app; Fredi, SricamJune 2018: password "123" on the label, cloud on by default; the cloud operator "gets all the data"no: the vendor chose not to fix it
iLnkP2P (Shenzhen Yunni)a UID like FFFF-123456-ABCDE on the label; Hichip, Tenvis, VStarcam, WanscamApril 2019: over 2 million devices could be found and their passwords and video interceptedno patch; blocking outgoing UDP port 32100 limits it
ThroughTek Kalaynot visible in the app; inside the Owlet Cam, Wyze Cam v3, Roku Indoor Camera SEAug 2021: audio and video reachable on older versions. 2024: takeover from the home networkyes: patched by April 2024; update the camera

From CISA, Which?, SEC Consult, Bitdefender and the reporting in the sources, checked October 28, 2026.

If your camera came with CloudEdge, CamHi or Yoosee, the brand's own support cannot fix the platform. Update it, give it a new password, and keep it off the internet if it works locally.

Is deleted video really gone?

Not always, and not at once. In February 2026 the FBI said video in a missing-person case near Tucson was recovered from "residual data located in backend systems". The Nest camera had been disconnected and had no paid plan, and police had first said no video existed. Experts told CBS News that cloud deletion can be lazy, so files may linger for days.

What a company may do with uploaded data is in its policy, not its ads. Owlet's policy (July 2026) says this "may include using data to develop and train artificial intelligence and machine learning models", with de-identified data where possible. Video that never leaves your home has no backend to linger in.

Forum stories: which ones held up?

Some did. The Xiaomi case began as a Reddit post with screenshots of strangers' homes. Soon after, Google confirmed it and cut Xiaomi off. Others did not. In June 2024 Nanit owners reported a voice from their cameras; two security firms found no breach, and the cause was an audio bug.

Some stay open. A Wyze owner posted in 2020 that his cameras talked to a server in China; the thread has screenshots but no answer from Wyze. Researchers at New America found a monitor regularly contacting a Beijing server that did not belong to its maker. The data was small and may only have helped the app find the camera.

A quick test for any story: is there a company statement, a regulator's document or a researcher's write-up? A screenshot of an IP address is a lead, not proof.

How to check what your camera sends

  1. Open your router's device list. Most router apps show each device's traffic. A camera that uploads all day while nobody watches is sending video or thumbnails.
  2. Log its lookups. A Pi-hole or your router's DNS log shows which names the camera calls. Look the names up: the maker's cloud, a time server, an update server.
  3. Block its internet and see what still works. Use the router's parental controls or a firewall rule for the camera's address. Check live view on your Wi-Fi, alerts, and the view from outside.
  4. Read the policy's transfer section. Search the privacy policy for "transfer" and "hosting": the countries are named there.
  5. Let updates through now and then. A blocked camera gets no firmware fixes. Unblock it once a month, update, block again.

The local-only route

The way out is a camera that streams on your own network. Cameras with RTSP or ONVIF send the picture to an app on your Wi-Fi that asks with the right password. Tapo, Imou, Hikvision, Dahua and Reolink do; Ring, Nest, current Wyze and most Xiaomi models don't. The camera checker answers for your model.

Set the camera up with its own app, then block its internet on the router. TP-Link says Tapo cameras need the internet for setup, remote viewing and clock sync, and work locally once set up. You lose the maker's alerts and remote view; the picture stays in your home. Setup is in the IP camera guide and the Tapo guide; the Xiaomi model table shows which of those can stream locally.

Where Mamoon fits

Mamoon reads a Tapo, Imou, Hikvision or Dahua camera over RTSP on your home Wi-Fi, with no cloud and no account. It recognizes crying on your phone, so the camera's sound stays in the house. It does not block the camera's own calls to its maker; that is a router setting. Sound and cry alerts are free; the picture is $29.99 once or $3.99 a month after 14 days free. For the hacking side, see can baby monitors be hacked.

Frequently asked questions

Is TP-Link a Chinese company?

Not any more, by its own account. TP-Link Systems Inc. is based in Irvine, California, and says it split from China's TP-LINK Technologies, which now serves only mainland China. US states dispute how complete the split is in lawsuits filed in 2026; no court has ruled.

Is a Tapo camera safe for a nursery?

It can be. Use a strong password and a Camera Account, keep firmware updated, and decide whether the camera may reach TP-Link's cloud. Watched over RTSP on your Wi-Fi, with its internet blocked, the picture stays at home.

Is eufy safe now?

Anker admitted in 2023 that eufy's web streams were not end-to-end encrypted and that thumbnails went to its cloud. It says it encrypted the streams, locked down its web portal and hired outside auditors.

Are Hikvision and Dahua cameras banned in the US?

New models are. Since November 2022 the FCC authorizes no new equipment from them. Cameras already sold were not recalled, and the order does not make owning one illegal for a household.

How do I know which company runs my cheap camera's cloud?

Look at the app it told you to install. CloudEdge means Meari, CamHi means HiChip, Yoosee means Gwelltimes. A UID sticker with letters, six digits and letters points to a shared P2P service. Then search that platform's name with "vulnerability".

Do cameras made in the US avoid these problems?

No. Ring, Wyze and Nest, all American, had the account takeovers and server mix-ups that showed homes to strangers. The safest setups keep video off any company's servers, wherever the company is based.

Sources

  1. TP-Link fact sheet: TP-Link Systems Inc., Irvine, split from TP-LINK Technologies; Tapo privacy policy (updated December 9, 2024): US and Singapore controllers, clips on AWS; TP-Link FAQ: RTSP and ONVIF on Tapo cameras; TP-Link community (moderator): what Tapo cameras do without the internet (all sources opened October 28, 2026)
  2. PCWorld, December 18, 2024: US agencies investigating TP-Link (citing the WSJ); Engadget, October 30, 2025: proposed Commerce ban (citing the Washington Post); 9to5Mac, February 18, 2026: ban reported shelved; The Register, February 18, 2026: Texas sues TP-Link; CE Pro, October 15, 2026: five state suits, the Tapo app claim, TP-Link's response
  3. Xiaomi privacy policy (updated July 31, 2026): hosting locations, remote access from mainland China; The Register, January 3, 2020: Xiaomi stills on a Nest Hub, Google's block, Xiaomi's statement
  4. eufy privacy commitment: local storage, AWS; The Record, May 17, 2021: eufy feeds shown to random users; Gizmodo, February 1, 2023: Anker admits unencrypted streams and lists its fixes
  5. BleepingComputer, December 29, 2019: Wyze database; Bitdefender, March 29, 2022: Wyze Cam flaws; CBS News: Wyze, February 2024, 13,000 users; Wyze forum: RTSP beta for v3 and Pan v3
  6. FTC, May 31, 2023: Ring order; Ring, January 13, 2021: end-to-end encryption; Google: Nest camera footage and your Google Account; Google, February 11, 2020: verification for Nest accounts
  7. Nanit: privacy and security; Nanit, June 20, 2024: audio issue, no breach found; The Register, October 14, 2016: Owlet base station
  8. Dahua, October 2018: Imou launched as its consumer brand; Imou privacy policy (May 13, 2025): data centers; Filing summary, March 3, 2025: Dahua to sell its Huacheng stake
  9. CSIS, August 6, 2020: Hikvision ownership; EZVIZ app privacy policy: data centers and transfers; EZVIZ FAQ: RTSP and ONVIF password; Federal Register, October 9, 2019: Hikvision and Dahua on the Entity List; FCC Covered List, March 12, 2021; FCC order 22-84, November 2022
  10. Reolink privacy policy; Reolink: working without the internet
  11. EZVIZ customer-service privacy notice (August 30, 2022): servers in China and Ireland; Tuya trust center: seven data centers; Tuya, September 11, 2021: reply to US senators
  12. Nebraska Attorney General: suit against Lorex (September 2025); Texas Attorney General, February 19, 2026: suit against Lorex; Insurance Journal, June 15, 2026: Missouri sues Lorex; Courthouse News: Lorex moves to dismiss in Nebraska
  13. PetaPixel, May 11, 2026: Meari cameras exposed (reporting The Verge); Smart Home Perfected, May 22, 2026: CloudEdge brands, 118 countries, firmware 3.0.0; Which?, June 12, 2020: CamHi cameras; SEC Consult, June 21, 2018: Gwelltimes P2P cloud; SecurityWeek, April 26, 2019: iLnkP2P; CISA ICSA-21-229-01, August 17, 2021: ThroughTek Kalay; Bitdefender, May 15, 2024: Kalay in Owlet Cam, Wyze Cam v3, Roku
  14. TP-Link security advisory (updated August 14, 2026): Tapo CVE-2025-8065, -14299, -14300; New York Attorney General, January 28, 2025: eufy settlement; Claims Journal, April 29, 2024: FTC refunds to Ring customers; NBC, February 10, 2026: Nest video from "residual data"; CBS News, February 11, 2026: experts on cloud deletion; Owlet privacy policy (July 2026): AI training
  15. TP-Link forum, April 2021: Tapo C200 lookups blocked with Pi-hole; Wyze forum, January 2020: "China server"; Tech Policy Press, March 4, 2021: a monitor contacting a Beijing server

Spotted a mistake or an outdated figure? Write to [email protected].

How these pages are made: an AI model drafts them from our own tests, real app screens and the sources listed, and Jan Drábek checks every page before it goes live.

A video baby monitor you already own

Mamoon turns an old phone or a Wi-Fi camera into a baby monitor. It recognizes a cry by itself, wakes you even with the nursery sound muted, and the picture never leaves your Wi-Fi.

QR code for mamoon.appOn a computer? Scan it to have Mamoon on your phone.Get it onGoogle Play
$29.99 once, for life, or $3.99 a month with 14 days free · on the App Store and Google Play · How Mamoon works